** Chapter
13 **

**THE VORTEX FIELD OF DARK MATTER AND MAGNETIC FIELD**

13.1 The “WG absorbing (or emitting) field” and the “vortex composed field in light matter ether.”

In the following I am
going to discuss magnetic interaction, according to the result of the study on the essence
of electric field in the light of “WG” theory. Certainly, I am not concerned about the
study of the properties of these functions, but the understanding of the reason by which
magnetic interaction is produced and its mechanism. I would like to get an answer to the
following question:

What is magnetic field?
Why magnets will attract or repulse each other? Is magnetic field a special substance or
some state of the motion of substance?

Formally,
varying electric field or moving electrons can induce a magnetic field. First I will
discuss the relation between the motion of electrons and a magnetic field. As is mentioned
in the previous section, the electron itself is set in a space like Orbital State. It
tends to absorb “WG” to a state of fulfilled orbit. While I also consider “the
Ampere’s loop current”, the electron in general is, set in probability motion (the
probability motion on an atom orbit). It can induce a hole-like vortex field of “WG”
through its interaction with “WG ether”.

When I used the dynamic knowledge to examine the interaction between vortices and/or with
electric charge, I found that the interaction was completely consistent with the
right/left hand rule in the theory of electromagnetism.

When using some experimental method to
change the state of “proton” into an electron-like state with high frequency, the
proton is in a fully filled state, it can induce both a releasing field and vortex field
of “WG” forming a complex field, when submitted to oscillation and rotation. The
property of the complex field is opposite to the hole-like vortex field of electrons. I
define the composed Motion State of “WG” vortex field as magnetic field. In the
established math-physical theory, we can easily find a suitable method to deal with the
problem mentioned above.

**13.2 The mathematical method for deriving electric and magnetic
experimental laws theoretically.**

Assuming an electron is
set in “Ampere’s electric current” state, and the unit voracity is b_{0}. I can calculate
the contribution of the voracity, induced by “Ampere’s current”, to the intensity of
the field at point P, i.e. the intensity of the hole-like “WG” vortex, denoted by B.
We have

Let the constant K· b_{0}
= b (w b), B_{W} is nothing but
the magnetic field strength. It can be measured in the experiment as B (T).

The curve integral of a plane enclosed
by a curve is defined as . If it does not vanish for some curves

The resultant component of
the interaction of “WG” hole like vortex field, which is parallel to the plane, is not
zero. Therefore there is a WG flux (or call it charge flux) in a direction normal to the
plane S. this indeed is current effect.

Where, the
constant µ_{0} is a magnetic
susceptibility.

It is distinct from the
previous treatment in the electromagnetic theory, which also uses the mathematical method
to deal with the “vortex motion”, but it is non-mechanism, i.e. the realm of
experimental law. At present I know that using the mathematical method of voracity, the
magnetic field can be treated correctly. The essential reason is that magnetic field is
indeed the substantial particle and vortex of ether. Its dynamic character of motion is
the same as a vortex in fluid.