Chapter 13

THE VORTEX FIELD OF DARK MATTER AND MAGNETIC FIELD

13.1 The “WG absorbing (or emitting) field” and the “vortex composed field in light matter ether.”

In the following I am going to discuss magnetic interaction, according to the result of the study on the essence of electric field in the light of “WG” theory. Certainly, I am not concerned about the study of the properties of these functions, but the understanding of the reason by which magnetic interaction is produced and its mechanism. I would like to get an answer to the following question:

What is magnetic field? Why magnets will attract or repulse each other? Is magnetic field a special substance or some state of the motion of substance?

Formally, varying electric field or moving electrons can induce a magnetic field. First I will discuss the relation between the motion of electrons and a magnetic field. As is mentioned in the previous section, the electron itself is set in a space like Orbital State. It tends to absorb “WG” to a state of fulfilled orbit. While I also consider “the Ampere’s loop current”, the electron in general is, set in probability motion (the probability motion on an atom orbit). It can induce a hole-like vortex field of “WG” through its interaction with “WG ether”.

When I used the dynamic knowledge to examine the interaction between vortices and/or with electric charge, I found that the interaction was completely consistent with the right/left hand rule in the theory of electromagnetism.

When using some experimental method to change the state of “proton” into an electron-like state with high frequency, the proton is in a fully filled state, it can induce both a releasing field and vortex field of “WG” forming a complex field, when submitted to oscillation and rotation. The property of the complex field is opposite to the hole-like vortex field of electrons. I define the composed Motion State of “WG” vortex field as magnetic field. In the established math-physical theory, we can easily find a suitable method to deal with the problem mentioned above.

13.2 The mathematical method for deriving electric and magnetic experimental laws theoretically.

Assuming an electron is set in “Ampere’s electric current” state, and the unit voracity is b0. I can calculate the contribution of the voracity, induced by “Ampere’s current”, to the intensity of the field at point P, i.e. the intensity of the hole-like “WG” vortex, denoted by B. We have Let the constant K· b0 = b (w b), BW is nothing but the magnetic field strength. It can be measured in the experiment as B (T).

The curve integral of a plane enclosed by a curve is defined as . If it does not vanish for some curves The resultant component of the interaction of “WG” hole like vortex field, which is parallel to the plane, is not zero. Therefore there is a WG flux (or call it charge flux) in a direction normal to the plane S. this indeed is current effect. Where, the constant µ0 is a magnetic susceptibility.

It is distinct from the previous treatment in the electromagnetic theory, which also uses the mathematical method to deal with the “vortex motion”, but it is non-mechanism, i.e. the realm of experimental law. At present I know that using the mathematical method of voracity, the magnetic field can be treated correctly. The essential reason is that magnetic field is indeed the substantial particle and vortex of ether. Its dynamic character of motion is the same as a vortex in fluid.